"Interpreting the law through cases", the kind that Fang Dazhuang had done before.

Although we have written law rather than case law, it does not mean that precedents have no meaning for judicial decisions.

No one expected that when public opinion reached such a boiling point, the Guangming District Court did not say anything, but instead the Supreme People's Court came out to release such news.

Of course, the Supreme Court did not publish this case alone. The Supreme Court publishes classic cases in every issue of "Interpreting the Law through Cases", and the selection of cases is not restricted by time. For example, there are as many as three cases in this issue.

The first one is the case of Zhou Yi and Qiyi Company paying for advance on-demand viewing, and the second one is a case that occurred in Hannan, which also involves the application of the new provisions of the Civil Code.

This is the problem that has been criticized by many people in the past: "Let people ride in the car for free and then have to pay full compensation if an accident happens."

The most direct and simple understanding of many people is that I gave him a ride out of kindness, but now he has had a car accident and I have suffered great losses myself, so I have to compensate him in full?

This doesn't seem right no matter how you think about it.

The new Civil Code has added new provisions on "good faith ride-sharing".

"If a non-commercial motor vehicle causes damage to a free passenger in a traffic accident, and the motor vehicle is at fault, its liability for compensation shall be mitigated, except where the motor vehicle user has acted with intent or gross negligence."

This provision directly determines the compensation liability after an accident occurs during "goodwill ride-sharing" from a legislative perspective.

But please note here that it is "should be reduced" rather than "should not be compensated". You still have to pay compensation, but you don't have to pay all of it. The compensation can be reduced.

This time, such an incident happened in Hannan, which was the first time in the country, so it was issued by the Supreme People's Court as a classic case of "interpreting the law through cases."

As for the third one, it is Wang Wucheng’s divorce case, which is also the latest application of the Civil Code after the revision of the marriage and family regulations!

In the words of the Supreme Court, this case is the first "compensation case for the party at fault in marriage." In the past, even if one party was at fault in a marriage, it would have little impact on the division of property at the time of divorce. It could even be said that there was basically no impact.

Of course, if you insist, there are actually some cases, such as when someone commits bigamy or cohabits with others, there may be some compensation for mental damage.

Not to mention how difficult it is to collect evidence, just talking about bigamy or cohabiting with others, it is really difficult to say in this situation.

Because we all know that cheating, adultery, one-night stands, prostitution, domestic violence, etc. are actually the most common causes of problems in marriage.

This is also a point that many people criticize. In ancient times, if adultery was discovered, the person would be thrown into a pig cage. In modern society, there are all kinds of infidelity, and after that, the property is divided however it should be. This really doesn't make sense!

And please note that what is being discussed here is also compensation for mental damage, because the original marriage law and related judicial interpretations did not stipulate that the party at fault would receive less property.

However, the new Civil Code has new regulations on marriage and family. The party at fault will not be kicked out of the house, but will actually get much less property.

After reading this, you will understand that the Supreme Court will not care about your little noise. They picked out this case as a classic case of interpreting the law through cases. The focus is on the party at fault, not the determination of domestic violence.

There is a special law for the identification of domestic violence. It can be said that this is a law that many people who talk about "domestic violence" rarely read. It is the Anti-Domestic Violence Law issued a few years ago!

There are detailed regulations on what constitutes domestic violence...

Under such circumstances, releasing such news naturally shocked the netizens.

Especially those who set the pace on major platforms, after a short wait, they directly started to attack the Supreme Court’s account!

"Is this the Supreme Court? They're just jumping out to support it, right? I just want to ask, why don't you explain the key point of this matter? What did the girl do wrong? When does it become domestic violence when someone voluntarily hands over their wages? Please explain it directly!"

"Yes, please explain directly, instead of using specious words to brush people off. We just want the truth. We just want to know how you define domestic violence and on what basis it can be considered domestic violence!"

"That girl's father is also going to jail now. In this land where the flowers of evil bloom..."

"Please explain directly!"

It is followed by a long list of "please give a positive explanation", which seems very reasonable and well-founded. Our focus is on domestic violence, what the hell are you talking about.

Audience members like Zhou's sister, Sister Yuan, were also confused after seeing the Supreme Court come up with a law based on case interpretation.

"Holy crap! The Supreme Court actually stood up for Attorney Fang? Two of the three cases were cases filed by Attorney Fang. Is this the power of a lawyer?"

Sister Yuan was stunned. Of course, even an audience member like her did not carefully distinguish the focus of both sides. It can be said that everyone watches the news according to their own mood.

But if you think about it, you will know that the Supreme Court really wouldn't come up with a special case interpretation law to respond to such a trivial matter. They really don't have that much free time...

Soon after, Sister Yuan was even more shocked. That group of people actually rushed to the Supreme Court!

It's so exciting, really so exciting. I've heard before that some crazy fans would attack those who sell green rice dumplings and run restaurants for their idols, and they always say "Even if you are against the whole world, we will support you."

This chapter is not finished yet, please click on the next page to continue reading the exciting content!