Some netizens who study economics made such a calculation based on the on-site situation:

According to the winner-takes-all rule copied by Qiao Qiao:

Qiao Qiao's one million yuan capital could have been distributed to ten people, but as long as there were a steady stream of netizens signing up for this event, she could continue to expand the entrepreneurial group of these ten people.

【Theoretically speaking, this business is a sure win! 】

[The biggest flaw is, how can she guarantee that the person she chooses will only make money and not lose money? ]

If everyone loses money... or the donations disappear, wouldn't her efforts be in vain, and she might even end up in debt?

This is indeed a bug.

In view of what happened before, netizens were waiting with great glee for the first group of people to flee.

Unexpectedly, Qiao Qiao plagiarized the entire thing. After working hard all night and selecting fifty people to pay, she actually used her own connections to find the boss of the Note APP.

Qiao Qiao: "I'm filming and live streaming the whole thing. You understand, right?"

The owner of the Music Note app: "I understand! I understand!"

In this public opinion war, other small websites that had just risen to prominence last time began to wait and see again, which must have made Sister Qiao very unhappy.

If he wants to restore the status of their Note App in Sister Qiao's mind, he must seize this opportunity.

As for the public opinions and videos on the Internet?

If it came out before the last Lin Jiaoer incident, the owner of the Note APP might have believed it a little.

But now?

Sister Qiao could even beat up the fried kid in front of everyone, and still let you live after the fight?

hehe!

Even if it is slander, it should be more precise.

What if Sister Qiao is a big devil who kills people without blinking an eye?

It’s more believable than this!