Of course, no one knew that the Capital Internet Court had already held countless meetings on this case.
For these two to face off, and in a case like this, the judge must be very capable!
Otherwise, given the temper of some people, they might argue directly with the judge, which would be embarrassing.
The young judge who was originally in charge should step aside. He feels a lot of pressure watching such things happen.
Qing City, Professor Tong is naturally ready.
At nine o'clock, the presiding judge in charge of the trial announced the opening of the court.
Needless to say, just looking at the bald head of the presiding judge, you can tell that he is a strong man.
At the same time, countless people flocked into the live broadcast room, because today, some law professors used this live broadcast to teach.
According to many people, this case is very likely to become a classic case and may even affect the further compilation of civil law.
Because it is really too typical, and it was a blind spot in the past.
What exactly is the nature of TV startup ads? Are they the same as those on mobile apps?
Or is it of the same nature as the advertisements posted in elevators? This is the core point of the case.
Not to mention other TV manufacturers, the precedent of this case will basically determine the court's precedent for similar cases in the future.
Although this is only the first instance, the first instance judgment of the Imperial Capital Internet Court itself can explain certain situations.
The gavel falls and the trial begins!
Attorney Fang began to read the indictment, and the procedure was nothing special.
Some viewers who were watching the live broadcast were a little suspicious, because Mr. Fang looked very calm.
It's not as inhumane as rumored, he is not inhumane in court.
In front of the computer, Professor Tong was wiping cold sweat, fortunately this was online.
I haven't seen him for so many years. He seems to be more aggressive.
There is definitely something wrong with this guy surnamed Fang. How could a normal person do such a thing?
Fortunately, I came prepared this time!
With these things in mind, the stage of presenting evidence and cross-examination has already begun.
Mr. Fang came prepared, or rather, he already had some understanding of the format of TV startup ads.
Moreover, we have corresponding countermeasures for the questions that Professor Tong may raise.
The first piece of evidence is the proof of the startup advertisement, proving that such a thing exists and cannot be turned off with one click.
This has been notarized, and Professor Tong has no objection because it does exist. His argument isn't about whether startup ads are illegal, but whether the revenue from them should be shared with users!
Attorney Fang then proceeded to produce other evidence. Besides some procedural evidence, the most important piece of evidence, and the one Professor Tong valued the most, was the fact that the startup ads would play even when the computer was offline.
This evidence can be said to be the core evidence for Fang Dazhuang's name to come out.
Of course, normally the startup ads are all embedded in a similar way. The content will be automatically downloaded every time you connect to the Internet, and then this content will be used as the next startup ad.
So Professor Tong spoke directly: "Regarding the evidence itself. (This chapter is not yet finished!)
Not only did the other party not delete the article, but they also wanted to sue me?
Two-in-one
There is no objection, but there is an objection to its probative value."
"Although startup ads will play even when the device is offline, they are not hardware-based ads. Instead, they are ads related to software, cloud services, and other content, and require an internet connection to play."
"So, I think..."
Professor Tong did not notice that when he said this, Mr. Fang on the screen flashed a sneer.
After the presentation of evidence and cross-examination, the court debate begins.
Zhou Yi could clearly see that Mr. Fang had sensed something, or rather, he seemed to have known what Professor Tong was thinking.
Mr. Fang did know what the other party was thinking. He simply wanted to prove that startup ads also existed based on content services, so they were no different from those TV program ads.
"If you turn on the TV through the Internet, you are using the TV's software and audio and video services, which do not belong to the TV hardware itself."
"If the plaintiff continues to use the TV's software and audio and video services, it will continue to incur costs for the TV manufacturer!"
"This part of the cost has nothing to do with the TV hardware itself. Therefore, setting up startup ads is itself taken from the audience and used for the audience."
Professor Tong expressed his core point: when you buy a TV, you are buying the thing, but that thing cannot play programs by itself.
The broadcast of these programs belongs to the Internet category and does not belong to hardware, and users do not pay for this content.
Therefore, the advertisements downloaded during this process should not be regarded as advertisements for the hardware itself.
After hearing this, many people on the Internet began to nod their heads, as if this was indeed the case.
Finally, Mr. Fang spoke, and his first sentence was that there was no necessary connection between the program itself and the advertisement.
He didn't care about the cost, that's the TV manufacturer's business.
If you think this part of the cost is high, you can increase the bid, but since you have sold the item at this price, you are deemed to have accepted this cost.
The core of the problem is that the ads downloaded every time you connect to the Internet for the next time you turn on the TV can be considered as built-in ads!
"From evidence one, we can see that users themselves cannot turn off this ad, so we have reason to believe that even if we are no longer connected to the Internet, this ad will still exist!"
"In this case, I think TV startup ads can already be considered hardware-based ads!"
Not only did the other party not delete the article, but they also wanted to sue me?
Two-in-one
Continue read on readnovelmtl.com