The report also pointed out that if pharmaceutical companies invest huge sums of money in the research and development of drugs but are deprived of patents and profits, then these pharmaceutical companies will no longer have the motivation to develop new drugs in the future.
How can medical technology advance in this way? There are still so many diseases that endanger our lives and health. When diseases change, and we don't have the latest medicines to control them, who will suffer?
Do you want money or life?
Well, this time the focus of public opinion controversy has become this.
Regardless of whether they are well-intentioned or just trying to take advantage of the popularity, a large group of celebrities have jumped out again, but this time there are more people supporting the pharmaceutical companies.
For example, a certain super-rich American is currently suffering from lung cancer. Fearing death, he even loudly appealed in the newspaper:
As long as any pharmaceutical company invents an effective drug to treat lung cancer, he is willing to donate $1 billion to the company that successfully develops the drug.
The newspaper's editor-in-chief, presumably having received some bribes, said the following in the "Editor's Comments" of this news item:
"Would you rather face death or pay $50 for a life-saving drug?"
This statement was in response to Professor Marit's previous statement that the $50 drug represented a black-hearted drug, but after being packaged by the media, it became a $50 drug that saved lives.
Now, the ball was kicked to Marit, and the pressure was on his shoulders. Let's see how he responds.
At this point, the whole world is watching this debate. If it goes wrong, the loser may be ruined.
(I’m asking for a monthly ticket at the end of the month, thank you)
Continue read on readnovelmtl.com
