Ever since entering Chapter 15 about the prehistoric disaster, everyone has been asking about the size of ants and their appetite. Indeed, if the size of the ants were that large, ten Earths would be eaten by ants, completely turning them into an ant empire. If they continue to reproduce, the planet will sooner or later not be able to bear it.
First of all, thank you all for your book reviews. I am always open to opinions, and I will ask people to reply to most of the questions. Unfortunately, the ant monster involves too many settings in the later part of the book, and I can't explain it all at once. Otherwise, I would reveal the secret. You can take a look at what I'm going to say below first, and maybe you won't question it anymore.
Let’s talk about the novel first, which is about the end of the world.
When humans were able to evolve and hunt zombies to increase their strength, they were still destroyed by monsters. Many prehistoric civilizations, such as Atlantis and ancient Babylon, were very powerful, but eventually disappeared in the long river of history. There are inside stories in the settings of my outline.
In apocalyptic novels, the biggest enemy of mankind and the cause of the destruction of the world are nothing more than monsters. In this case, ant monsters are also monsters. They bring destruction to mankind and even the earth. It is like ordinary people against endless zombies, and new humans against endless ant monsters. It's just that the power ratio of both sides has increased, but humans are still at a disadvantage.
What the protagonist needs to do is to change this trend in future development and remove the ants, the destructive growth bomb. This is the first way to save the end of the world. It can also be said that it has made a contribution to the entire human race and even the entire earth from the side.
In the book, ants have the excellent genetic lineage of prehistoric giants, so their strength is 400 times their weight, so they can easily defeat creatures of the same weight, except for special types.
Under the virus.
The genes of various monsters have revived to the prehistoric level, reaching the level of their ancestors, and may evolve further to become stronger. The harsh environment is the best place to promote the evolution of life.
The question now is, with so many ants on the earth, how can the protagonist eliminate them? Can the protagonist complete this seemingly impossible task?
Recently, because of everyone's questions, the book often gives answers, which reduces the rhythm. Large paragraphs are used to explain the book reviews, which reduces the pleasure of reading the book. It makes me a little depressed, and I have to open a separate chapter to explain.
For example, the ants' strength of 30 people increased tens of thousands times in the first month, while the tiger's strength only increased 50 times. This is a foreshadowing. Some people may say that this is another loophole, but it has been explained recently, and people will not think so later.
In fact, many foreshadowings have been quietly laid in the first 100,000 words.
My foreshadowing may not be as many as Chen Dong's. His is grand and conspicuous, making people know it's a foreshadowing right away, which is equivalent to a domineering figure. My foreshadowing is not explained, but quietly buried, which can be understood as a killer.
As a semi-new writer...
Without the fame of a great writer and a high click-through rate, people would think this is a newcomer, and a newcomer's book would have some loopholes, so...
We are in trouble.
Of course, there are still some problems in the book. After all, what has been written so far involves the evolution of viruses, the development of various life forms, etc., and there is a lot of scientific content. Friends who have high education, broad experience, and love science can see it and point it out at once.
I can only say that some are foreshadowings. You may think this is a loophole, but when you posted it, I saw it and would probably reply if I have time. If it is a real loophole, I will also admit it frankly. After all, although I have written a book of millions of words, I still feel that I am a newcomer and have a lot to learn.
When a newcomer writes a book, there will be some loopholes.
But I hope that you guys will be magnanimous and forgive me for some of the less serious mistakes, such as the ant monster, which is a serious problem, so you keep posting and replying.
Just hope I see it.
Then I revised it and wrote it better. I feel your kindness and I am very grateful for your support.
When faced with flaws like these in the book, I will reply to the post to explain them. If they are foreshadowings, I may not explain them too explicitly, otherwise, if people mention the foreshadowings I wrote in the future, I will have to dig them out, which would be a bit ridiculous.
I remember that there were typos and some minor omissions in the chapters I wrote before, and I acknowledged them and corrected them immediately.
After all, there is still a long way to go...
If there is a mistake, it must be corrected.
Only in this way can we make progress.
I recently saw a post saying that monster evolution is just about strength and size?
Actually, it is not. From the chapter about Butterfly Superman, it is written that butterflies originally only sprayed stinky gas to drive away enemies, but after evolution, butterflies can spray poisonous gas. This is a change.
It's only been two months. If the monsters in the early stages had all kinds of talents and skills, and each had its own unique attributes, it would be illogical. After all, the history of evolution is a long process. Although the speed has soared countless times under the virus, it would still be too outrageous if they didn't evolve to the same appearance in just one month.
There is no mistake in the poem, post, content, and read the book on 6, 9, and bar!
The protagonist Ant Superman takes the main attack route and comprehensively increases his strength. The book also says that the Ant Giant is a prehistoric super peak bloodline and a super overlord monster on land.
As the protagonist, it is impossible for him to remain so dull forever.
There are still many things to say, but I don't know where to start. The fact that everyone has raised such questions is also my mistake. If there were fewer foreshadowings and more explanations when I was writing, perhaps everyone would not have raised such questions.
It’s about my opinion on foreshadowing in writing books.
As foreshadowing, if people can see that it is a foreshadowing, what’s the point of calling it a foreshadowing?
In the future, I will try to write the foreshadowing more prominently, or in other words, I will leave some hints so that some careful people will know that this is a foreshadowing.
This will reduce doubts and make everyone feel more comfortable watching it. Thank you all for teaching us a lesson. I will continue to work hard in the future.
at last……
I also hope that everyone will support me and vote more in the future. If you have any opinions, please speak up. Most people will reply to the thread or reply in the book. At least I am still free now and have the time to reply. In the future, the more solid the book is, the fewer doubts you will have, and the happier you will be. This is what I look forward to.
);.