In the past, these self-media had references when writing articles.

For example, Lu Ban’s movies have a high box office, so there is naturally a basic view that Lu Ban’s movies are good.

A high box office means the movie is good, there is nothing wrong with that.

Of course, an opposite point of view can also be derived from this, that is, the person is not worthy of the position, the movie is not good, and the box office is high only because of the timing and various off-field factors.

Where there is opposition, there is discussion. Where there is discussion, there is heat. Where there is heat, the number of readers increases. Where there is high reading volume, the traffic increases, and then you can make money.

Simply put, the job of self-media is to output opinions.

It doesn't matter whether it is good or bad, in short, there must be a diode, it must be opposed, and there must be no mediocrity.

Because when others read your eloquent article with both praise and criticism, they will feel that it is the same as saying nothing. Isn't this nonsense? I also know that there are good and bad things. Do I need you to teach me how to do things?

It has to be blown to the sky or stepped on to death.

In the past, Lu Ban’s movies have always been either popular or not. Of course, the popular ones are: they were the annual box office champion, top five in the historical box office, and won awards at the three major art film festivals. You can brag about any one of them.

There are also many black ones.

Some students may ask, Lu Ban’s movies are so popular and have won so many awards, why are there still people criticizing him? Have these people’s IQs been lowered by Lu Ban’s halo? Are they the kind of idiots in fantasy novels who know the protagonist is very powerful but still want to step on him, or are they the masochists who like to be slapped in the face every day?

Of course not.

Life is life, work is work.

Those who hate Lu Ban might actually be his fans in real life and watch the premiere of every movie.

But self-media and public accounts are all about gimmicks. Think about it, if amidst all the praises, someone suddenly pops up to criticize Lu Ban, wouldn’t it make people click on the link involuntarily?

This is why these self-media are waiting and watching.

Because the movie Lu Ban contains a lot of things, and everyone is not sure whether their understanding is correct. If you just come up with a point of view and then find out that it is untenable or just doesn't fit in with everyone else, then it would be a waste of effort.

Moreover, there is no box office data for this movie, so the ratings must be very high. It is difficult to refer to it, and it all depends on your own understanding.

Therefore, the best way at this time is to wait for the first person to try it out, see what his opinion is, how others react, and then make targeted modifications.

For ordinary public accounts, Heihong has prepared more than two manuscripts and acts according to the situation.

This is why in the past there were countless articles reviewing movies right after they were released, but this time, the manuscripts were not published until the next morning.

The title of this article is "When the "doomsday" comes, Lu Ban shows us the despair of human nature."

The article starts with the plot, and after a brief description, it moves into the topic.

[…In Lu Kan’s previous films, the horror came from the unknown, from monsters that might appear out of nowhere, and from the distortions and weirdness in daily life. But this one is different. Natural disasters such as volcanoes, typhoons, and tsunamis are certainly horrifying, but in this film, these special effects are more like “cool points” that make the audience feel refreshed…]

[…What really scares people in this movie is the most familiar humans. The measures chosen by humans in this movie to save the world seem to be fine at first glance, but as the situation becomes more and more desperate, many people, even the audience, begin to think that the actions in the movie are correct. This is the most terrifying thing…]

[…Imagine that when we see murderers in movies, we think they have committed crimes. This idea is normal. If this person kills to eliminate violence and protect the good, then most people may accept his criminal behavior, which represents our simple sense of justice and values. However, this movie puts the scene under extreme conditions, tortures humanity, and puts the audience into the same dilemma. The answer obtained is incredible, but in that environment, it has won the recognition of many people…]

[…There was a classic experiment in the past, which was about whether people would choose to hurt others under extreme conditions. The subjects were given a button that could shock the other person if the other person did not answer the question or obey. At the beginning, the subjects maintained their conscience and did not continue to shock the other person, but as the experiment continued, most of the subjects began to accept the measure of shocking the other person. In such an environment, it is difficult for human nature to maintain its original integrity…]

[…We are afraid because we might really turn into demons in such a situation. What we fear is not the unknown, but our own alienation. When you can survive by abandoning your humanity and reason, will you make this choice?]

[… “The End of the World” is more of a prophecy than a disaster film. It predicts the consequences of human beings abandoning humanity and reason when disaster strikes. After watching this movie, I can’t help but feel fortunate that I am not in such an end of the world. At the same time, I have a different understanding of the world. In Lu Ban’s words, my soul has been healed.]

The tone of this article is simple, it is just praise.

With the appearance of this article, commentary articles about "Doomsday" began to surge, some praising it and some criticizing it, and it became a hot search several times in one day.

Even on the famous RPG website [Did You Understand], there was a large-scale debate about this movie. One side agreed with the viewpoint conveyed in Lu Ban's movie that people must not lose their humanity and reason under any circumstances. The other side felt that when necessary, humanity and reason could be abandoned for the sake of survival, and the settings in the movie were just settings.

Lu Ban looked at the numbers that kept jumping in the cold and indifferent text of the system, and felt that it should not be a problem to complete the transformation of the world outlook, values ​​and outlook of 100 million.

For many people, if you say something extreme, they will not agree, but if you first propose the extreme thing and then compromise, they will agree.

Lu Ban's movies show the most extreme scenes. He does not expect everyone to agree with these views, but many people will think about them after watching them and come to their own conclusions.

This is also a transformation of cognition.

He shifted his gaze from the system text on the wall and looked at Feng Yu lying on the sofa.

Her eyes were closed and she seemed to be suffering from a high fever.

Lu Ban unzipped Feng Yu's long down jacket.

Then he saw that underneath the down jacket was no ordinary coat or sweater.

A mass of squirming flesh and blood was slowly melting, flowing, and about to drip down.