Frankly speaking, I was a little surprised to see the previous reviews of the Tarot Club. I thought that some people would say that the Tarot Club has become repetitive and not interesting enough, but I didn’t expect so many people to say it so intensely.

I summarized the problems of Tarot Club a long time ago, and I talked about them at the end of the second part and the end of the third part.

Why not write about it? First, because it will cause time to be divided into small units of one week after another, and the development of things will be fragmented, fixed, and procedural. Secondly, as an organization with weak members, lack of cooperation, and can only hide on the surface, the connection between each other is not close enough, and the information that can be exchanged will gradually be insufficient. Taking Klein as the main body, unless, within a week, most of the members' stories and experiences are made into side stories instead of daily rotation, but I believe I don't need to say more about what kind of reading experience this will cause.

Thirdly, as a meeting, a meeting with gods, superficial funny and humorous things can be vetoed and will not be considered. Tarot Club will not do that in the past, will not do that now, and will not do that in the future. Therefore, interesting points and reactions can only be concentrated in the brain. When the information content is not enough, the procedures are becoming more and more fixed, and there are no new people joining, repetition and a certain degree of boredom are inevitable. But isn’t this the norm for meetings? Haha. If there is no brain communication, and it is all simple question-and-answer communication and body movements, believe me, the meeting will be a hundred times more boring.

So, I have been saying that many times, I will skip over the Tarot and write briefly, and that’s the reason.

So why do we have to write it? When the information involves the growth of members' mentality, changes in ideas, and the shaping of their characters, we have to write it. If we add it later when we encounter the corresponding situation, it will definitely appear abrupt and not gentle enough, and readers will lack psychological preparation.

In fact, when I was writing the interpretations of the two terms "island" and "depths of the starry sky", I was very satisfied and found it very interesting, because it was not only based on personality, but also involved the differences in each other's insights, knowledge, and emotional tendencies. It was very interesting. Moreover, when a normal person knew that this was an important issue involving Emperor Roselle and heard the corresponding content, how could he not try to understand and guess? It would be abnormal not to do so. Derrick was abnormal because he could not understand the importance of Emperor Roselle to the outside world.

Also, since the Tarot Club a long time ago, except for the most important news, I have tried to write in detail only one or two, at most three, at a time, and just briefly mention the others. But no matter what, that one stroke is still necessary, otherwise the characters will disappear and fade away.

As for whether their imaginations were exaggerated, the magician had met Dwayne Dantes and had said bad things about him behind his back. She also felt that she owed him money. In addition, when they were working together, Gehrman Sparrow showed his agility and madness, so it was inevitable that she was afraid. In addition, she didn't know what hidden dangers the Pharaoh Mummy symbolized. Wasn't it normal to be curious about its function? The reason why she didn't ask later was not because she thought it was gossip or bad words, but simply because she thought that one shouldn't pry into other people's secrets casually. Well, don't be embarrassed by using a God's perspective.

The Hanged Man's fear stems from the difference in strength and the identity of the other party's followers. Just like in the workplace, if you offend the boss's confidant, would you worry about being kicked out of the company, left to fend for yourself, or retaliated against?

Sometimes, leaving blank space has charm, but if it is not written clearly, you will really be criticized. After all, readers are not here to do reading comprehension. Just like this time, why did Bernadette ask the question in this way? Think about the implied attitude and the comparison of the status of both sides, and you will understand the reason. Then, she was mentally retarded.

Really, sometimes I feel really confused when being accused. I think Xiao Ke is very soft-hearted because he can help Bernadette eliminate two wrong options. If the other party guesses the truth because of this, it will be a big trouble. If he is a little more cruel, he can just ask to change the question directly and say that the current diary does not reflect it.

Another time, I saw someone say that Audrey was too innocent and childish, always pouting, which didn't fit her character. I was ashamed, thinking that I had never written like that before, so I quickly opened the documents and searched for the word "pout" one by one. As a result, I found that there was only one pout in the whole text, which was "Xiu". Audrey only puffed her cheeks a few times, but even adults sometimes do this unconsciously, right?

Having written so much, I still have to sincerely apologize in the end, because, in the final analysis, it is my problem. I failed to write clearly, people could not understand it, failed to write more interestingly, and better dilute the repetition and monotony, resulting in a poor reading experience. These are definitely the author's problems and failures. There is no reason or excuse. We must summarize experience and find ways. At present, there will definitely be no Tarot Club for a long time. This is not something I thought of now, but something I had prepared in the beginning. I am ready to jump the timeline at any time. . Well, before, it was because I wrote about E. Dantes, and his daily life was relatively dull. If I transferred to other members, and they had no connection with Klein, it would directly dilute the main line, and the perspective would be very messy. This is the result of previous attempts. When Klein comes out and there are more exciting things, the plots of other members can be naturally unfolded. I have been delaying the progress of Little Sun for a long time.

Finally, I would like to say that having to write a single sheet to explain so much is the author’s biggest failure. I will continue to reflect on this.