In Bai Song's opinion, there are too many loopholes and clues in this case.
When you try to cover up a clue, you often leave more clues.
First, since the contact person and the driver did not communicate through the phone or other means, then what did they communicate through? According to common sense, if you want to hit Bai Song's car, you must get the information as soon as possible and then prepare to catch up. Otherwise, if the information is a few minutes behind, you will not be able to catch up.
The second question is, how did the contact know that the driver had dinner at the restaurant? Why did he rush over to destroy the video today? Why didn't he know about it yesterday or the day before yesterday?
What on earth were the people doing who secretly destroyed the surveillance equipment today?
The third is that the car has been professionally modified. Who did this? It is impossible for someone without any auto repair skills to do this. Moreover, ordinary auto repair shops would not dare to do this kind of modification even if they were paid.
This is not a modification of anything else, but the brakes were modified to fail, which is simply a joke. So this car must have been modified where it was parked, and it is impossible that it was driven here after the modification. The driver's previous parking spot has also been found, and there is a lot of evidence left at the scene.
Fourth, who modified the car's seat belts? This is two different things. The driver doesn't want to die. If the seat belt is broken or looks broken, he is not stupid.
Bai Song would not underestimate anyone, even the dead driver, who was definitely not a fool. Therefore, he had no doubt that there was no problem with the seat belt when it was fastened.
It was only after a violent collision that the car's seat belts had problems, which is also a technical job. And it is likely that the same people who modified the brakes before were not the same people, because this modification was to avoid the driver.
fifth……
What era is this? How dare you play like this...
Is this treating the police as fools? Perhaps in the eyes of non-professionals, this is a so-called perfect crime, but there are a lot of loopholes, and every time someone tries to erase a new loophole, it will either leave a new evidence loophole or a new logical loophole.
Analyzing them one by one, there may be several ways to contact each other, and the most likely way is direct contact. In other words, the location of the contact person is visible to the driver, and the two people communicate directly through gestures.
Based on the parking spot for the car, Bai Song and everyone analyzed the building structure of the community. If the contact person wants to be able to see Bai Song's parking space and the driver's parking spot at the same time, there are not many places to choose from. Team Li directly arranged two people to go to the scene.
Regarding the incident of someone destroying the surveillance today, this person's information has now arrived on the desks of several people.
"There's something wrong with this person. I don't think he's normal." Someone raised the point: "We need to give him a mental evaluation."
"Well, we must do it." Captain Li agreed.
"Yes, yes, we have to do it." Someone echoed, "I'll report to Team Qin right away."
"No need." Captain Li raised his hand to stop him, "Don't worry, Captain Qin will definitely make arrangements."
This man is called Wang Shujun, a farmer from Gan Province, in his 40s. He has been in Tianhua City for some time, working there. He was very uncooperative with the police. He knew nothing when the police asked him questions. When asked why he wanted to destroy the surveillance camera, he said he wanted to steal something, but there was nothing to steal and he was afraid of being discovered, so he destroyed the surveillance camera.
Everyone thought that this person would not be a contact person, but more likely someone hired him to do this, and probably made some promises.
This person is stupid and stubborn. He probably took the money and was taken advantage of.
Sometimes, people like this are hard to be taken seriously anywhere, but once someone shows him kindness, he is easily moved. Regarding his analysis, it is generally believed that the person who hired him gave him a lot of money, which was enough for him to be willing to take the risk of being caught.
If it is just intentional damage to property, this matter is at most an ordinary criminal case, and it does not even meet the standards of a criminal case. Therefore, even if this person is caught by the police, he will probably be told to stay in prison for 7 to 15 days at most.
If it is a public security case, administrative detention is a punishment, and the maximum period for a single case is 15 days; if it is a criminal case, the maximum period is 7 days, after which the patient will either be arrested or released.
An arrest is out of the question; the case is too minor.
According to Article 122 of the Criminal Procedure Law: the period during which a criminal suspect undergoes a psychiatric evaluation shall not be included in the case handling period.
In other words, if the seven days of detention are regarded as an hourglass with a seven-day countdown, then once the psychiatric evaluation begins, the hourglass will stop and will not start again until the evaluation results come out.
After everyone analyzed it, they concluded that if the detained person was detained for more than fifteen days, he would definitely have great distrust of his "employer", and the matter would become much simpler.
From the game with the opponent, it can be seen that this opponent handles many details very well and knows how to destroy evidence.
Wherever you go, you leave a trace - Edmond Rocca.
There was once a very hot topic: if a professional criminal investigation expert were to commit a crime, would it be possible for him to commit the perfect crime?
There is actually an answer to this question: No.
This is like asking, is it possible for top doctors and academicians to understand all medical skills?
The same is true for criminal investigation experts. The further they go in an industry, the more specialized they will become. Maybe a footprint expert can handle his own footprints perfectly, but he may not be able to handle other clues.
…
Next is the issue of car repairs. During the repair and modification process of such a large car, as well as the parking scene, many traces were found. In terms of technique, this person has some skills, but there are many bumps and bruises.
In other words, the damage to the vehicle's braking system was most likely caused by nighttime operations under poor lighting conditions.
What is the nature of destroying these things?
If these car mechanics knew a little bit about the law, they would never do this.
Let's talk about the act of damaging the brakes first. If the mechanic knew that the driver was going to kill someone, then he would be an accomplice to the crime of intentional homicide; of course, he probably didn't know, so according to Article 119, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law, he would have violated the crime of damaging a means of transportation, and it has caused serious consequences. In this case, the sentence is exactly the same as that for intentional homicide.
Furthermore, the act of destroying the seat belt is definitely an accomplice to intentional homicide.
Bai Song couldn't help but feel helpless for these people. For such a serious crime, how much money should they get?
Continue read on readnovelmtl.com
