What's more, asking a healthy person to donate part of his body to others.
Medicine cannot provide 100% guarantee, which is reflected in the fact that many publicity about donations is limited to moral publicity, and technical defects are avoided if possible. The people cannot be deceived, which is the most ridiculous point for all medical personnel about this publicity strategy. If you deceive the people and say that there are no side effects, once they find out that it is not the case, they will question everything you say and hate you to death.
The propaganda says that bone marrow transplantation is not about bone transplantation, but about peripheral blood stem cells, which is painless and has no risks. In fact, before each donor donates, they will receive an informed consent form, which lists various risks and requires them to bear the consequences themselves. A lot of volunteers who registered previously cursed, because they were not told about this during the propaganda.
Why do medical staff feel this most deeply? Because when their clinical explanations are not sufficient, they will often be told by the general public that they have deceived them and then they will hate them as a doctor.
Human life is of paramount importance, and people put human life first. How can you lie to people? You should know that saying something is less is a lie in the eyes of people.
What is the final result? Not to mention in China, the bone marrow regret rate abroad can reach more than 50%. Doesn't this kind of propaganda make people feel that they can deceive as many people as possible? It is simply a strategy of self-defeating and smearing, and it is ready to be smeared all the way. I don't know whether it is propaganda to encourage people to donate or propaganda to encourage people not to donate.
Is donation encouraged or not? Of course it is. Many medical staff are registered volunteers. They know that donation poses very low risk to their own safety and can save lives, so why not do it? However, there is an important prerequisite: the donor must be a healthy person.
Medical research is about healthy people donating to patients. It is not okay to ask an unhealthy person to donate, and it is also irresponsible to the patient.
If an unexpected event occurs, we need to conduct a scientific analysis of the specific case. If we encounter a medical accident, it happens to be the unlucky 0.01%, and there is nothing we can do about it, so the principle of voluntariness is even more necessary. Another type of accident is avoidable, which is caused by improper operation. The possibility of occurrence is higher and it is the root cause of most cases.
...
...
Even if you don't understand, for example, when Xie donated blood last time, all the teachers scratched her nose. You can donate your love. But please take responsibility for yourself first. If something happens to the donor and causes serious consequences, it will be spread out and affect the trust and confidence of the whole society in the donation cause.
Those who don't understand will scold those who regret donating. Those who understand the seriousness of this matter will not scold any medical staff or donation center staff. Forcing people to donate is like tying them up and using them as livestock. The social impact of accidents after the donation is even more devastating. Like Ding Lulu last time, you can induce her to donate, but you can't force her to donate. If she regrets donating at the last minute, she must be respected.
Where does forced donation usually happen? Family members.
To what extent can relatives force donations? How many people in the same family force an individual to donate, and if he/she does not donate, he/she will be socially killed. There must be a limit to sympathizing with the weak, otherwise it will be a more terrible oppression of another weak person.
Continue read on readnovelmtl.com
