Jiang Mingzhu and Yu Xuexian, who had just left, were discussing this matter. Jiang Mingzhu's thoughts were consistent with Teacher Lu's, and she believed that the junior sister was likely to be discriminated against by a foreign reviewer.
The reason why she asked as soon as they met was because ever since He Xiangyu had leaked that it would be approved soon, it still hadn't come out yet, which made people wonder.
Jiang Mingzhu argued: "She should have given her opinion to the editor-in-chief and complained that there was something wrong with the reviewer."
Internationally renowned journals carry reputations, and their editors-in-chief are relatively fair-minded academics.
Yu Xuexian lifted his glasses with his fingers, appearing much calmer than his younger wife.
Things are not that simple. If a complaint could solve the problem, why would Director Fang emphasize the need to build a good domestic platform?
What is academic publication called?
Seize intellectual property patent rights.
Think about it, if the research topic of your published article happens to be the same or similar to that of someone else, and that person happens to be the reviewer. Do you think that the reviewer will be upset when he sees that you have obtained his research results before they are published? Will he let you pass the review smoothly?
...
...
The main problem with Xie's paper is that it passed smoothly without any doubt from any big shot in China. Don't say that everyone in China has to look up to big shot Cao Yudong. This is impossible. Cao Yudong has his own competitors. No wonder Teacher Lu suspects that someone abroad is wearing tinted glasses and has ulterior motives.
There are more talents in international academic competition, which is undoubtedly much more competitive and cruel than that within a single country.
Don’t say stupid things like “scholars have no national boundaries”, that’s just to fool young people who don’t understand society. There are many people in the world who are calculating and are eager to use such nonsense to get some stupid scholars who dream of academic purity to share their results.
If you can’t figure it out on your own, you can learn from other people’s shared results.
It can be said that the world of high-IQ scholars is never aloof, but rather a world of “killing”. The academic world requires money, and without money, there is no development, so it is bound to be linked to commercial interests. Business wars are like battlefields, so how can the academic world not be a battlefield?
It can be seen from this that once you are unlucky enough to encounter this kind of problem during the submission process, the situation will be far more complicated than you imagined.
As long as there is a conflict of interest, it is impossible for peer reviewers not to secretly attack you. How to attack you? People with high IQs are more insidious. Take Zhou Ruomei's extremely insidious way of attacking her own relatives, and she is just a small shrimp with a low IQ.
The most common way is to drag you to death.
They won't reject you directly. If they reject you directly, they may ask you to submit to other places. It's better to ask you to revise your manuscript frequently once, twice, and three times. This is why the review time of some manuscripts is so long that it's unbelievable.
Of course, you can't say that all reviewers who ask you to revise your manuscript are bad reviewers. How can you tell whether the reviewer has good intentions or ulterior motives?
Like what happened to classmate Xie.
The good news leaked by Dr. Li Xiaoshen was not wrong. She passed the first three reviews of the international platform quickly, which was enough to predict that her manuscript would be published soon. In the end, she was stuck in the hands of the fourth reviewer.
The fourth reviewer kept finding grammatical errors in her paper.
This once again proves that Director Fang's words make sense. If domestic platforms become stronger, they can gain another advantage that is needed: the language system.
The academic barriers and traps of different language systems are also difficult for outsiders to imagine.
It would be fine if the reviewer really found her grammatical errors, but by picking on the grammatical errors, he intended to ask her to change the key academic information in the paper and the logical structure of her own paper.
Continue read on readnovelmtl.com
