Xie Wanying had to listen to what the foreign editor-in-chief opposite her said first.
It is impossible for the editor-in-chief to say that she made a phone call just to praise how well the surgery went.
For busy people like this, congratulatory calls must be accompanied by interests.
Wilson could clearly feel that her intelligence and insight seemed to see through him when she spoke to him, and he was secretly shocked and deeply regretful.
Seeing her calm and composed temperament, one would be awed by her. One should not regard her as an ordinary young doctor. If he had known this, Wilson thought, he should have written an email to communicate with her personally or called her in advance like this, so that he would not be fooled and fall into the trap.
If you make a mistake and regret it, correct it quickly. If you don't correct it, someone else will take over your manuscript. Wilson made a prompt decision.
Then Xie Wanying heard the editor-in-chief personally promise her that her paper would be included in the latest issue of the academic journal for publication.
Xie Wanying had to ask: Has the fourth review passed?
It hadn't passed the review before, so she was asked to revise the manuscript.
...
...
Wilson told her what Sulima had said: as long as she logged into the electronic account of the submission system (this account is usually owned by the corresponding author, i.e. the supervisor), she would find that Sulima had reviewed and approved her manuscript immediately after the surgery demonstration, and would send her a notice in the system that the paper had been formally approved. This meant that she didn't have to revise the manuscript anymore.
And Sulima planned to invite her to visit his university laboratory.
Wilson conveyed the sincerity of the invitation to her on behalf of the other party.
It was obvious that Boss Sulima felt guilty and embarrassed after being slapped in the face, and he didn't dare to invite her in person.
Which university laboratory did Sulima come from? Someone who could make editor-in-chief Wilson give him three points of respect and several points of respect should not be an ordinary professional leader.
First, let's talk about the review process of academic journals. As mentioned before, the peer review after the initial review can be said to be a review by the bigwigs in the industry. The mainstream peer review methods usually have the following three methods: one is public review, where the author's name and the reviewer are disclosed to each other. This corresponds to single-blind and double-blind review. Double-blind is easy to understand, where the identity information of the reviewer and the author is concealed from each other. Single-blind is like now, where the reviewer can know the author's information, but she does not know the identity information of the reviewer.
In addition to the editor-in-chief, the corresponding author may know the information of the reviewers because he is responsible for external liaison (now I finally understand what the corresponding author means). The corresponding authors of her paper are Zhang Da Lao and Cao Yudong. So Zhang Da Lao knew that the reviewers could invite people to watch her surgical performance.
Now that the review is complete, Single Blind can reveal the answer.
Wilson formally introduced to her which university laboratory Professor Sulima came from.
After hearing the other party's identity, Xie Wanying immediately understood why the other party was trying to "trip her up".
What was the predecessor of surgical robots? CAS, or computer-assisted surgery.
As the name suggests, the focus of the research at the beginning was computers rather than robots, and the concentrated research and technical field was the concepts and methods of using computer technology to assist in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation for surgical treatment.
Later, with the integration and progress of industrial design, the application scenarios of surgical robots showed that robots rather than computers played a dominant role in surgery. As a result, the status of computers declined relatively, until the word "computer" was simply removed from the name of the technology.
Continue read on readnovelmtl.com
